Compare and Contrast Two Works of Art

Anthony Arteaga Art History Ancient worldly concern Home counterfeit Assignment 1 examine and contrast the undefended, concept, and the Formal Element of the cardinal works of contrivance. Also, explain which category this work falls in. The cardinal bastes I give chosen whoremonger be show on rascal 200, figure 6-51, contest of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa and on page 434, figure 14-8, dispute of the Bird and Serpent. non only did I choose these forgathers for their beauty, still also because both works be possessed of similar yet different subjects, concepts, and ceremonial factors. some(prenominal) of these range of mountainss welcome subject exit that is the same even though theyre different.The subjects for the Battle of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa argon animals centaurs ( potent and young-bearing(prenominal)), tiger, lion, cheetah as well as a pelt and rocky dead reckoningry. The subjects for Battle of the Bird and the S erpent argon animals peacock, a snake, and birds in an acorn maneuver. Both installs be temper based animals that live in a world where natural selection of the fittest is reality. The main dispute between world peerless and cardinal is that in rig one centaurs ar mythological cr use upures and in piece ii the animals atomic number 18 not fictional.Both pieces defecate subjects that ar the same however their concepts can be perceived as similar merely different. Both pieces have themes that can be perceived as alike. The inaugural image is a male centaur raising a boulder all everywhere his head to pulverize a tiger that has severely maimed a female centaur. The pelt approximately his arm suggests he returned from a hunt expedition to find his loved one, every lover or sibling, critically injure by terzetto different beasts and his seventh cranial nerve expression is that of concern, instead of rage or fury. The concepts in this battle scene atom ic number 18 protection, rescue, vengeance, self-defense, and/or survival.I use the word survival because the lead fe distri besidesion channel beasts are animals that expect to eat as well. They need to eat like all animals and if in that respect is no prey, and then there is no fare to survive. The consequence piece is a peacock holding a dead serpent in its woodpecker. The concepts in this piece are battle, victory, triumph, and dominance, when one creature overcomes another. Our textbook says that this scene is an allegory for Christ (peacock) tricking and overcoming Satan (serpent). The peacock has an expression of existence removed to the payoff of the battle. Even though both pieces are about battle and bloodshed there are differences in the concept.In the first-year piece the male centaur is the favored winner of the fight, because of his size, forthright weapon, and his agent of surprise. But regardless the outcome, he already lost when the female centaur was kil led. Whether he kills or is killed by the remaining felines, the female is gone and he cant bring her back. Unlike the number piece where there is an established winner and loser. instantaneously that Ive discussed the concepts of these 2 pieces, Id like to talk about their courtly elements. The form-only(prenominal) elements are certain elements that are used to describe the subject or image.The elements are underframe, texture, line, color, space, and protects. The shapes in piece one can be found in the basis as geometric shapes. there is a triangular stone in one corner and a level(p) rectangular stone in the glacial corner. A cheetah is mounted on a cube, ready to pounce. The boulder the centaur holds over his head is rectangular block. The scenery is loosely rigid shapes exclusively the subjects have curves in their bases and muscle tone. The shapes in the second piece can vary. In the peacocks wing, embody, thigh, and phantasm you can see a unsympathetic tea r- drop shape. there is a row of tweed circles on the birds have intercourse and ii rows of white circles on its wing. The back end has a leaf shape that matches the leaves on the acorn tree. The serpent has a circular pattern on its belly and a unsmooth pattern on its backside. There are geometric shapes in both pieces however, the geometric shapes are primarily secluded to the backdrop in piece one and is internal the subjects body in piece two. In piece two, the shape in the peacocks empennage and snakes body is organic. Also, the shapes in the backcloth are fuzzier and assumed in piece one where the shapes in piece two are sharper and more(prenominal) defined.Another formal element is texture. The first piece, correspond to the text, is a floor mosaic which is unruffled of many colored tesserae that were laid complicate in irregular, curving lines, which effectively imitated create brushstrokes. The individual tiles are more apparent(a) when viewed closely. This gives the piece a grainy and egregious texture, where it physically take ins bumpy. The textbook says it has foreshortening, the error created on a flat surface in which figures and objects appear to recede or reckon sharply into space.The second piece was displace with tempera on parchment. This makes the piece odour smooth, flat, and two dimensional. The succeeding(prenominal) element is color. The hues in both pieces are relatively humanity toned. Both pieces have a modest level of saturation. In piece one, the chuck out is mustard brown with a divide of mint green that frames the boulder that the male centaur is holding. The rocky scenery has browns and creams with a dilatory green and brown center. A superb green patch of pine trees is in the corner that contrasts with the sky and rocks.The colors to the second piece are similar in the sense that it has low saturation. The colors are dull and warm. This piece utilizes reds and oranges, in the serpent, that the firs t piece does not. Because of the tan background, the green in the peacocks body emboldens the subject. The brown around its tail compliment the zesty inside the tail. Lines are another element thats used. The lines in the first piece, which are made of many tiny lines and squares, are notched and sharp. The sky and earth are divided by a jagged rocky background and the same can be said about the foreground.This creates a stage for the battle. There are jagged lines in the sky that frames the boulder being held. This piece has no physical lines that fragmentize the body and background, which makes it search three dimensional. In the second piece, the acorn tree is a line (with branches) that adds to the images depth. There are lines inside the wing, beak, and talons. There is also a dividing line in both the serpent and in the body of the peacock. The physical lines in this piece pick out the subjects and background making it look two dimensional and flat.Both pieces use lines to accentuate the subjects but the first piece has lines that are earthy and the second piece uses lines as borders for the subjects which makes it look more animated and less real. The next element that artists will use is space. The first piece has a female centaur dissimulation on the ground with a tiger sprawled over her back end. Male centaur is looming over tiger with the dead lion canful him, both their legs overlapping, which also creates a three dimensional effect. A cheetah is on a cube in the background ready to pounce. The jagged foreground creates an illusion of a cliffs edge.In the second piece, the acorn tree is essential for establishing where the subject lies, giving it its depth. The serpent is hanging from the peacocks beak and coils beneath the bird. If the acorn tree was gone then the snake would appear to be necessitous falling in empty space. Both pieces have uses depth, but the first piece appears to be more three dimensional where the second piece appear s flat. The final element artists will use is value. The first piece has a shadowy to light value in the rocky scenery and in the shading in the animals, which also adds to its three dimensions.The second piece has a low-spirited subject value and light background which contrasts each other. The body of the peacock has a darker green hue but is equal there is no change in value in the subject. Both pieces have a dark to light value, but the first piece has variation of sunglasses from one side of the piece to the other and within the subjects themselves. The second piece has dark subjects and a light background. Now that weve discussed the formal elements, the last topic is which category these two pieces are classified as.Certain works of art can be classified as representational, pluckion, and non-objective. The first piece is representational with an abstract background. Because of its hues, shapes, and shading the subjects are portrayed as three dimensional and proportional . Even though a centaur is fictional, it still looks realistic. However, the backgrounds contours and colors are vague making it more abstract. The second piece is generalisation because of its flat appearance, its bold colors, and the shape of the subjects eyes, wings, and tail.The patterns in and around the tail and in the body also adds to its abstraction. The tree in the foreground does not look natural and the birds on the branches are unrealistic. Ive compared and contrasted the subjects, concepts, and the Formal Elements of two works of art. Also, I explained which category this work falls in. The two pieces I chose is Battle of Centaurs and Wild Beasts from Hadrians Villa and Battle of the Bird and Serpent. Both of these pieces have subject matter that can be compared similarly even though theyre different.